It is not a drill
Even users were driven to satisfy the mapping flow are dropping out.
Assurances
Perhaps the site lengthy mapping process are the main drivers of dropout.
Assumptions
Perhaps users do not understand the product's instructions to proceed with the flow, especially when the first test is completed.
Assumptions
Does the HR team guide users on how the dynamics work within the product?
Doubts
Doubts
Is the product potential clear to HR analysts responsible for product implementation?
Doubts


Lack of clarity in the flow sequencing between profile mappings.
Insight
After one of the tests, users (employees) missed a clear link between them, assuming they were completing the task.
Self-knowledge issues to respond with confidence.
Insight
The test options need more semantic clarity because the meaning between the options was very close, provoking cognitive load.
Boring interface and long mapping user flow without visibility.
Insight
Lack of progress visibility and repetitive visual codes for different mapping flows (behavioral, values, and professional).
Lock and load

The main flow of products could have given the user the impression of a link between one set of instructions and another, which might have resulted in the user giving up. After completing one test, the system failed to stimulate the user to proceed to the other sets of instructions.


Not in Kansas anymore
We also have made significant revisions to the visual aspect to increase user engagement. With these enhancements in place, we have decided to embark on a new round of usability testing to validate or invalidate our improvements.



